首页> 外文OA文献 >Secondary Level Achievement Non-Intellective Factors Implicated in the Process and Product of Performance
【2h】

Secondary Level Achievement Non-Intellective Factors Implicated in the Process and Product of Performance

机译:中学过程成就非智力因素牵涉到绩效过程和绩效产品

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The study was developed in the context of Personality and Social Cognitive Theory with constructs that encapsulate non-intellective processes of academic achievement. The goal was to explore the role of the Five Factor Model (FFM) of personality in academic performance and to use this model as a reference point to test the incremental validity of two measures of Self-efficacy (Academic and Emotional) and an indicator of Absenteeism. Participants (N = 120) were comprised of 17-year-old male (n = 47) and female (n = 73) opportunistically sampled secondary level college students. A cross-sectional design was used to examine the relationship between the independent variables (FFM, Academic Self-efficacy, Emotional Self-efficacy, and Absenteeism) and the outcome variable, Grade Points Average (GPA). Correlation analysis found that four FFM factors and the two Self-efficacy measures were associated with GPA. In a hierarchical regression analysis, the FFM explained 22% variance on performance and the two Self-efficacy measures added 9% incremental variance followed by 3% for Absenteeism. Overall, the non-intellective constructs explain a substantial 34% variance on achievement and provide focal points for theoretical, empirical, and pedagogical evaluation. Moreover, they are suggestive of the pathways and processes that support learning, augment ability, and enhance achievement.
机译:这项研究是在人格与社会认知理论的背景下进行的,其结构囊括了非智力的学习成就过程。目的是探索人格的五因素模型(FFM)在学业成绩中的作用,并以此模型作为参考点来测试两种自我效能量度(学术和情感)的增量效度以及衡量自我效能感的指标旷工。参加者(N = 120)由17岁的男性(n = 47)和女性(n = 73)随机抽样的中级大学生组成。横断面设计用于检验独立变量(FFM,学业自我效能感,情绪自我效能感和旷工)与结果变量平均成绩(GPA)之间的关系。相关分析发现,有四个FFM因素和两个自我效能感测验与GPA相关。在分层回归分析中,实况调查团解释了22%的绩效差异,两项自我效能指标增加了9%的增量差异,其次是旷工的3%。总体而言,非智力结构解释了成就方面的实质性34%差异,并为理论,经验和教学评估提供了重点。而且,它们暗示了支持学习,增强能力和提高成就的途径和过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号